My Thoughts
Have you had that uncomfortable feeling lately that no matter what you think, or say, or do, it is wrong? Guilty, whether innocent or not; guilty by association, by ancestry, by mere existence? Damned if you do and damned if you don’t? Have you begun to doubt yourself, your sanity? Well, take heart, you are not alone, not by a long shot.
Most of us are not skilled debaters; most would not know a debate if they accidently stepped on one—probably think it was a cow pie—, let alone be skilled in the arcane art of sally and riposte, point, counterpoint, and rejoinder. We are too busy with our ordinary everyday lives to waste time in argument, so we say what we think and immediately we find ourselves indicted, (no trial,) convicted, and sentenced to the waste basket of deplorables never realizing that we have become victims of two logical fallacies: “The Prison of Two Ideas” and the “Kafka trap.”
I first heard of “the prison of two ideas,” from Greg Gutfeld which I know many will instantly dismiss but bear with me for it really makes a lot of logical sense. Often people who disagree or dislike your ideas or position will try to place you in “the prison of two ideas.” Their argument is premised on having only two positions—you are either for or against—and then they place you on the side that sounds the worst. For example:
- You are either for climate change legislation, or you want people to die
- You are either for gun control, or you want people to die
- You are either for open borders, or you want people to die
- You are either for wearing masks, or you want people to die
- You are either for closing churches, or you want people to die
- You are either for black lives matter, or you are a white supremacist, a racist, and you want people to die
But we also allow ourselves to become inmates in our own two-idea prison—by appointing an “idea warden.” This takes the shape of a political leader whose ideas become reflexively accepted as our ideas. Through a subtle submission to authoritarian allure, we end up settling on the side of an argument because he or she holds that side too. It’s political team sport stuff. And so if he decides that X is bad, you agree. If he believes we need less of Y, you do too. But if he changes his mind, realizing that X is good, and Y is a necessity, they you change with him as well. This “idea warden” gives you the freedom to ignore any alternative ideas because you’ve put all your eggs in his basket—whether that basket be trade, immigration or taxes. ~Greg Gutfeld.
Along with the two-idea prison which we too often find ourselves incarcerated, there is the Kafka trap. A Kafka trap is a fallacy where if someone denies being x it is taken as evidence that the person is x since someone who is x would deny being x. The name is derived from the novel The Trial by the Austrian writer Franz Kafka. The reason this is fallacious is that it lumps together people who genuinely are not guilty of a perceived offense in with people who have committed the perceived offence and are trying to escape punishment.
I am a Caucasian American male, therefore, I am a racist, a misogynist, and a xenophobe to boot. Guilty, guilty, guilty!
Too many Americans have imprisoned themselves within the walls of the prison of two ideas: America is either the land of the free and the home of the brave, a shining city on a hill or America is evil and must be destroyed and rebuilt into a socialist utopian dream. No one is perfect. No country is either. But when we fall, we can either get up, shake the dust off and learn from our mistakes or we can wallow in the mud, cry for nanny, and demand we be picked up and coddled, comforted, and assured that nanny will make it all better. Why not simply learn from our mistakes and correct them? Seems logical to me. Wake up America!
Just my thoughts for a Friday, for what it is worth.